Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2023, 59(6): 617-643 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2023.055

Vibrant Civil Society in Slovakia? NGOs Supported by the CEE Trust Are Still Largely Dependent on External Financing After 20 Years

Dalibor Jurášek ORCID...
Faculty of Education, Trnava University in Trnava

Large-scale funding of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) by states and corporations (external funding) can impact their functioning and diminish their civic character. It is therefore of importance to understand whether and how NGOs can become financially independent of external funding. In Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), many NGOs were kickstarted by large sums from foreign state and corporate sponsors with the hopes of creating an independent civil society reliant on domestic sources: a ‘vibrant civil society’. However, did these NGOs become financially independent? This article examines a sample of 14 NGOs in Slovakia financed by the Trust for Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE Trust), an organisation started by six private American foundations. Their funding is compared year by year, and it is found that between 2000 and 2020, foreign funding decreased from 97.2% to 55.2%, and corporate funding dropped from 92.1% to 31.2%. However, public sector funding increased from 1.2% to 35.6%. Civic funding remained low over the entire period, rising from 0.1% to 8.6%. Thus, external corporate funding was largely replaced by another type of external funding (public funding), and the role of one major foreign donor (the Trust) was largely replaced by another major foreign donor (European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) funds). The results suggest that it is difficult for NGOs kickstarted by external funding to achieve financial independence, at least on a timescale of 20 years.

Keywords: civil society, non-governmental organisation funding, financial independence, civic funding, income diversification

Received: February 14, 2023; Revised: November 21, 2023; Accepted: November 24, 2023; Prepublished online: December 12, 2023; Published: January 23, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jurášek, D. (2023). Vibrant Civil Society in Slovakia? NGOs Supported by the CEE Trust Are Still Largely Dependent on External Financing After 20 Years. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 59(6), 617-643. doi: 10.13060/csr.2023.055
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adolfová, I. (2009). Financovanie mimovládnych organizácií [Funding of non-governmental organizations]. In A. Brozmanová Gregorová (Ed.), Tretí sektor a mimovládne or-ganizácie (pp. 88-96). Univerzita Mateja Bela.
    2. Anheier, H., & Themudo, N. (2004). The internationalization of the nonprofit sector. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management (pp. 102-128). John Wiley & Sons.
    3. Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development, 66, 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028 Go to original source...
    4. Bútora, M. (1998). Tretí sektor vo svete a u nás [The third sector in the world and at home]. In Z. Pauliniová (Ed.), Čítanka pre neziskové organizácie (pp. 159-172). Partners for Demo-cratic Change.
    5. Bútorová, Z., & Gyárfásová, O. (2017). Názorový a hodnotový profil slovenskej verejnosti v čase vzostupu extrémizmu [Opinion and value profile of the Slovak public at the time of the rise of extremism]. In Z. Bútorová & G. Mesežnikov (Eds.), Zaostrené na extrémiz-mus (pp. 13-26). Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
    6. Cerrato, D., & Ferrando, T. (2020). The financialization of civil society activism: Sustainable finance, non-financial disclosure and the shrinking space for engagement. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 10(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0006 Go to original source...
    7. Crisan, E., & Dan, M. (2018). Revenue diversification strategies for non-governmental organiza-tions. Review of International Comparative Management, 19(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2018.1.31 Go to original source...
    8. Dauksza, J., Gielewska, A., Szczygieł, K., Cerniauskas, S., Kranceviciute, M., Lenkauskaite, L., … Sarkadi Nagy, M. (2020). The Golden Lion roars from Cracow. Vsquare. https://vsquare.org/the-golden-lion-roars-from-cracow/
    9. Demenet, P. (2001). Partnership or purse-strings: NGOs in the South speak up. The UNESCO Courier, 54(7), 60-63.
    10. Demeš, P. (2014). 20 rokov činnosti v prospech Slovenska [20 Years of Activities that Have Benefited Slovakia]. Open Society Foundation. https://osf.sk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/OSF-20-rokov-cinnosti1.pdf
    11. Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking civil society: Toward democratic consolidation. Journal of De-mocracy, 5(3), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0041 Go to original source...
    12. Dluhá, M., & Marček, E. (2004). Financovanie neziskového sektora na Slovensku [Financing of the non-profit sector in Slovakia]. In E. Kelley, & V. Kostolanská (Eds.), Poznávanie tre-tieho sektora na Slovensku (p. 172). SPACE - Centrum pre analýzu sociálnej politiky.
    13. Ebrahim, A. (2003). NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting, and Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488566 Go to original source...
    14. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1998). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongov-ernmental organizations. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 1(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v1i1.11299 Go to original source...
    15. Ekopolis. (2002). Annual report 2002. https://www.ekopolis.sk/engine/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/vyrocna-sprava-2002-SJ-AJ.pdf
    16. Filho, J. F., & Vargas, F. G. (2017). Role and limitations of NGOs in partnership with the State. Revista Estudios de Políticas Públicas, 3(1), 1-10. https://revistaestudiospoliticaspublicas.uchile.cl/index.php/REPP/article/view/46360 Go to original source...
    17. Foundation for a Civil Society. (2022). The Foundation for a Civil Society is a Small New York-based Nonprofit Organization (501 (c) 3), founded by Wendy Luers in January 1990. Foundation for a Civil Society. https://www.fcsny.org/fcs-history
    18. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the "Postsocialist" Condition. Routledge.
    19. Gehrerová, R. (2018). Sorosa už Slovensko nezaujíma, sme pre neho dospelí, hovorí šéf Nadácie otvorenej spoločnosti [Soros is no longer interested in Slovakia, we are adults for him, says the head of the Open Society Foundation]. Deník N. https://dennikn.sk/1071844/sorosa-uz-slovensko-nezaujima-sme-pre-neho-dospeli-hovori-sef-nadacie-otvorenej-spolocnosti/?ref=list
    20. Ghimire, K. (2006). Financial independence among NGOs and social movements. Development, 49(2), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100251 Go to original source...
    21. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Polity Press.
    22. Henderson, S. L. (2002). Selling civil society: Western aid and the nongovernmental organiza-tion sector in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002001 Go to original source...
    23. Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom's Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/honn16246 Go to original source...
    24. Huba, M. (2008). Ideál - Skutočnosť - Mýtus [Ideal - Reality - Myth]. PRO.
    25. Hudock, A. (1999). NGOs and Civil Society: Democracy by Proxy? Polity Press.
    26. James, W., & Caliguire, D. (1996). Renewing civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0007 Go to original source...
    27. Jurášek, D. (2021). Politizácia mimovládneho sektora na slovensku - prínos alebo hrozba pre občiansku spoločnosť? [Politicization of the Non-governmental Sector in Slovakia - Benefit or Threat to Civil Society?] [Rigorous thesis, Comenius University in Bratislava].
    28. Konecki, K. (2006). Reproduction of organizational culture - What does organizational culture recreate? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4(4), 26-41.
    29. Kover, A. (2015). Captured by state and church: Concerns about civil society in democratic Hungary. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 6(2), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2014-0010 Go to original source...
    30. Kuvíková, H., & Svidroňová, M. (2013). Význam a opodstatnenosť existencie súkromných neziskových organizácií [The importance and justification of the existence of private non-profit organizations]. Slovenská štatistika a demografia, 23(3), 3-17.
    31. Kuvíková, H., & Vaceková, G. (2009). Diverzifikácia finančných zdrojov v neziskových or-ganizáciách [Diversification of financial resources in non-profit organizations]. Ekonomie a management, 12(4), 84-96.
    32. Laciňák, J. (2013). Možnosti financovania environmentálnych aktivít mimovládnych nezis-kových organizácií [Possibilities of financing the environmental activities of non-governmental non-profit organizations]. In E. Ľapinová & G. Korimová (Eds.), Determi-nanty sociálneho rozvoja: Sociálna ekonomika ako priestor podpory európskeho občian-stva. Matej Bel University.
    33. League of Human Rights Advocates. (2019, July 20). Dnes sa uskutoční deviaty ročník pestro-farebného festivalu Duhovy PRIDE Bratislava [Today, the ninth year of the colorful fes-tival Rainbow PRIDE Bratislava will take place] [Status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/Ligazaludskeprava/posts/pfbid02zoiqUg7kKHoQFPX3HS3UhpGRLgBso1hrPjayz4Pk2uSauSKQwRJpQrgEPbtsbNA9l?locale=sk_SK
    34. League of Human Rights Advocates. (2023). Vízia a misia [Vision and Mission]. League of Human Rights Advocates. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://www.hrl.sk/sk/o-nas/vizia-a-misia
    35. McGann, J., & M. Johnstone. (2005). The power shift and the NGO credibility crisis. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 159-172.
    36. McMahon, P. C., & Niparko, L. W. (2022). Shrinking, shifting, and strengthening: The dynamics and diversity of civic activism in Poland. East European Politics and Societies: and Cul-tures, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221085308 Go to original source...
    37. Mikušovič, D. (2020, February 16). Focus: 58 percent Slovákov podporuje skôr konzervatívne hodnoty, 36 percent liberálne [Focus: 58 percent of Slovaks support rather conservative values, 36 percent liberal]. Deník N. https://dennikn.sk/1758929/focus-58-percent-slovakov-podporuje-skor-konzervativne-hodnoty-36-percent-liberalne/
    38. Milan Šimečka Foundation. (2020, July 24). Aj Nadácia Milana Šimečku podporuje Dúhový pride Bratislava 2020 [The Milan Šimečka Foundation also supports Rainbow Pride Bra-tislava 2020] [Image attached] [Status update]. Facebook. https://m.facebook.com/nadaciams/photos/ecnf.1465700384/3343187582368147/
    39. Milan Šimečka Foundation. (2023, July 25). Publikácie [Publications]. Nadácia Milana Šimečku. Retrieved July 25, 2023, from https://nadaciamilanasimecku.sk/publikacie_zoznam/
    40. Milelu, E. (2018). Factors Affecting Financial Sustainability for Non-governmental Organiza-tions in Nairobi, Kenya [Master's thesis, United States International University Africa]. https://documents.pub/document/factors-affecting-financial-sustainability-for-non-.html
    41. Ministerstvo financií Slovenskej republiky. (2022). Asignácia dane [Tax assignment]. Minister-stvo financií Slovenskej republiky. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.mfsr.sk/sk/financie/institut-financnej-politiky/ekonomicke-statistiky/asignacia-dane/
    42. Nezbeda, O. (2017). Chartu 77 podporovala CIA i západní diplomaté, říká historik, který dis-identům zajišťoval spojení s demokratickým světem [Charter 77 was supported by the CIA and Western diplomats, says a historian who provided dissidents with a connection to the democratic world]. Hospodářské noviny. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://domaci.hn.cz/c1-65578940-chartu-77-podporovala-cia-i-zapadni-diplomate-rika-historik-ktery-disidentum-zajistoval-spojeni-s-demokratickym-svetem
    43. Ochman, M. (2019). Financing development projects: An approach by civil society organiza-tions. Latin American Policy, 10(1), 144-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12157 Go to original source...
    44. Open Society Foundation. (2000). VÝROČNÁ SPRÁVA NOS - OSF 2000 [ANNUAL REPORT NOS - OSF 2000]. Retrieved July 26, 2023, from https://osf.sk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/VS-2000-SJ.pdf
    45. Open Society Foundation. (2021). Dúhové vzdelávanie [Rainbow education]. https://osf.sk/podporene-projekty/demokracia-a-ludske-prava-kategoria/duhove-vzdelavanie/
    46. Patterson, O. (2010). The mechanisms of cultural reproduction. In J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 139-151). Routledge.
    47. People in Need. (2016). Výročná správa 2016 [Annual Report 2016]. People in Need. https://clovekvohrozeni.sk/_docs2019/vs/cvo-vs-2016.pdf
    48. People in Need. (2023, July 19). Pride mesiac vrcholí [Pride month is at its peak] [Status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/clovekvohrozeni/posts/pfbid0X7u2BsPnzxoSYDG4SrCKBTFqTPnBAKGV4QxMZWxFTSe4udukx8w3YvdGJBbq6CTel
    49. Pickering, P. M. (2022). Civic engagement and its disparate goals in Bosnia-Herzegovina. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221081043 Go to original source...
    50. Pietrzyk-Reeves, D. (2022). Rethinking theoretical approaches to civil society in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward a dynamic approach. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 36(4), 1335-1354. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221081037 Go to original source...
    51. Pontis Foundation. (n.d.). Charta diverzity [Diversity Charter]. https://www.nadaciapontis.sk/projekty/charta-diverzity/
    52. Pontis Foundation. (2018). Charta diverzity Slovensko [Diversity Charter Slovakia]. Retrieved July 26, 2023, from https://www.nadaciapontis.sk/projekty/charta-diverzity/
    53. Pontis Foundation. (2020, December 21). V roku 2020 sme podporili 4 veľké dúhové projekty a jeden menší [In 2020, We Supported 4 Large Rainbow Projects and One Smaller One]. https://www.nadaciapontis.sk/novinky/v-roku-2020-sme-podporili-4-velke-duhove-projekty-a-jeden-mensi/
    54. Pontis Foundation. (2022). Reakcia zástupcov občianskeho sektora na nepodložené útoky poli-tikov o netransparentnom financovaní [The Reaction of Representatives of the Civil Sec-tor to Unfounded Attacks by Politicians about Non-transparent Funding]. https://www.nadaciapontis.sk/novinky/reakcia-zastupcov-obcianskeho-sektora-na-nepodlozene-utoky-politikov-o-netransparentnom-financovani/
    55. Praus, L. (2018, June 25). Fico sa vyhráža mimovládkam. Majú obavy z orbánovskej cesty [Fico threatens non-governmental organizations. They are worried about Orbán's path]. SME. https://domov.sme.sk/c/20856725/fico-sa-vyhraza-mimovladkam-zverejnovanim-zahranicnych-penazi-maju-obavy-z-orbanovskej-cesty.html
    56. Profant, T. (2015). Slovenské mimovládne "rozvojové" organizácie ako politickí aktéri [Slovak non-governmental 'development' organizations as political actors]. Sociológia, 47(1), 113-138. https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/03301256Profant%20-%20OK.pdf
    57. Rebeták, F., & Bartošová, V. (2020). Tax assignation as a source of financing for non-profit or-ganizations in Slovakia. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 159, 409-412. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125948394.pdf
    58. Reichardt, D. (2002). Democracy promotion in Slovakia an import or an export business? (The influence of international relations on civil society in a transitional state). Perspectives, 18(Summer), 5-20. Go to original source...
    59. Simsa, R. (2019). Civil society capture by early stage autocrats in well-developed democracies - The case of Austria. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 10(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0029 Go to original source...
    60. Soros, G. (1991). Směnka na demokracii [Underwriting Democracy]. Prostor.
    61. Sundstrom, L. M., Henry, L. A., & Sperling, V. (2022). The evolution of civic activism in con-temporary Russia. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254211070851 Go to original source...
    62. Strečanský, B., Murray-Svidroňová, M., & Andrejkovič, M. (2017). Ekonomická analýza nezis-kového sektora ako socioekonomického aktéra [Economic analysis of the non-profit sec-tor as a socioeconomic actor]. In G. Mesežnikov & B. Strečanský (Eds.), Občianska spoločnosť na Slovensku: Krízy, križovatky, výzvy (pp. 31-58). Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
    63. Svidroňová, M., & Vaceková, G. (2012). Current state of self-financing of private non-profit organizations in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. Technological and Economic De-velopment of Economy, 18(3), 438-451. Go to original source...
    64. Svidroňová, M., & Vaceková, G. (2014). Comparison of development of non-governmental or-ganizations and the current state of their funding in Slovakia and Austria. Review of Eco-nomic Perspectives, 14(3), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.702695 Go to original source...
    65. Themudo, N. (2004). Managing the paradox: NGOs, resource dependence and organisational independence-Case studies from Mexico and Portugal [Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science]. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2679/
    66. Transparency International Slovensko. (2022). O nás [About Us]. Retrieved March 1, 2022, from https://transparency.sk/sk/o-nas/
    67. Trust for Civil Society in Central & Eastern Europe. (2003). 2001-2003 Three Year Report. http://www.ceetrust.org/media/upload/2001-2003_Report.pdf
    68. Trust for Civil Society in Central & Eastern Europe. (2013). Report 2001-2012. http://www.ceetrust.org/media/upload/CEE_Trust_2013.pdf
    69. Vaceková, G., & Svidroňová, M. (2014). Benefits and risks of self-financing of NGOs - Empiri-cal evidence from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria. Ekonomie a Management, 17(2), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-009 Go to original source...
    70. Vladovič, M. (2008). Think tanky a ich vplyv na politický systém [Think tanks and their influ-ence on the political system]. Slovenská politologická revue, 8(3), 95-122.
    71. Vogel, B. (2016). Civil society capture: Top-down interventions from below? Journal of Inter-vention and Statebuilding, 10(4), 472-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2016.1192786 Go to original source...
    72. Wang, S. (2006). Money and autonomy: Patterns of civil society finance and their implications. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(4), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686301 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content