Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2023, 59(6): 567-591 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2023.026

Populism and Growing Welfare State Agenda: Elections of 2013 and 2017 in Czechia

Tomáš Sirovátka ORCID..., Lucie Novotná ORCID..., Steven Saxonberg ORCID...
Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno

Although previous studies show that welfare policies are important for populist voters, few studies have analysed in depth the social policy proposals of different types of populist parties. Since the Czech Republic is one of the few countries with a strong centrist-populist party that has been in power, this article concentrates on the Czech case and compares this centrist-populist party to the largest right-wing populist party and the main non-populist parties. We argue that the centrist and rightist Czech populist parties have developed different types of welfare agendas. The centrist-populist party supports encompassing and universalist policies (which it links to economic efficiency and administrative improvements); in contrast, the right-wing populist party supports the protection of those in need while preserving the principles of merit and economic incentives.

Keywords: Czech Republic, centrist populism, right-wing populism, welfare state, election programmes

Received: December 27, 2021; Revised: March 4, 2023; Accepted: April 11, 2023; Prepublished online: May 16, 2023; Published: January 23, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sirovátka, T., Novotná, L., & Saxonberg, S. (2023). Populism and Growing Welfare State Agenda: Elections of 2013 and 2017 in Czechia. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 59(6), 567-591. doi: 10.13060/csr.2023.026
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abou-Chadi, T., & Markus, W. (2019). The Electoral Appeal of Party Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: When Can the Mainstream Left Succeed? The Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1405-1419. https://doi.org/10.1086/704436 Go to original source...
    2. Afonso, A. (2015). Choosing Whom to Betray. Populist Right-Wing Parties, Welfare State Reforms and the Trade-Off Between Office and Votes. European Political Science Review, 7(2), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000125 Go to original source...
    3. Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875-1975. Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    4. Barr, N.A., & Whynes, D.K. (1993). Current Issues in the Economics of Welfare. St. Martin's Press.
    5. Betz, H.G. (1994). Radical Right-wing Populism in Western Europe. MacMillan Press. Go to original source...
    6. Brunnerová, O. (2019). Not All Entrepreneurs are Created Equal: The Institutionalisation of Entrepreneurial Parties in Central Europe. Central European Journal of Politics, 5(1), 100-124.
    7. Burgoon, B., Noort, S.V., Rooduijn, M., & Underhill, G.R. (2019). Positional Deprivation and Support for Radical Right and Radical Left Parties. Economic Policy, 34, 49-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiy017 Go to original source...
    8. Busemeyer, M. R., Rathgeb, P., & Sahm, A.H.J. (2021). Authoritarian Values and the Welfare State: The Social Policy Preferences of Radical Right Voters. West European Politics, 45(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1886497 Go to original source...
    9. Buštíková, L. (2019). The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism. East European Politics and Societies and Culture, 33(2), 302-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325418791723 Go to original source...
    10. Caiani, M., & Della Porta, D. (2011). The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A Frame Analysis of Extreme Right Wing discourses in Italy and Germany. Acta Politica, 46(2), 180-202. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.28 Go to original source...
    11. Enggist, M., & Pinggera, M. (2021). Radical Right Parties and Their Welfare State Stances - Not so Blurry After All? West European Politics, 45(1), 102-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1902115 Go to original source...
    12. Engler, S. (2020). Centrist Anti-establishment Parties and Their Protest Voters: More Than a Superficial Romance? European Political Science Review, 12(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000132 Go to original source...
    13. Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016). A Welfare State for Whom? A Group-Based Account of the Austrian Freedom Party's Social Policy Profile. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(3), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12218 Go to original source...
    14. Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2018). Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12325 Go to original source...
    15. Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter across Six Countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347-1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333 Go to original source...
    16. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press. Go to original source...
    17. Greve. B., ed. (2019). Welfare Populism and Welfare Chauvinism. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447350439.001.0001 Go to original source...
    18. Hanley, S., & Vachudova, A. (2018). Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic. East European Politics, 34(3), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457 Go to original source...
    19. Havlík, V. (2019a). Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(6), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1580590 Go to original source...
    20. Havlík, V. (2019b). Economy and Political Distrust: Explaining Public Anti-partyism in the Czech Republic. Human Affairs, 30(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0007 Go to original source...
    21. Heinisch, R., & Saxonberg, S. (2017). Entrepreneurial Populism and the Radical Centre: Examples from Austria and the Czech Republic. In R. C. Heinisch, Holtz-Bacha, and O. Mazzoleni (Eds), Political Populism: A Handbook (pp. 209-226). Nomos. Go to original source...
    22. Hill, M. (2003). Understanding Social Policy, Seventh edition. Blackwell.
    23. Hloušek, V., Kopeček, L., & Vodová, P. (2020). The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics. Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41916-5 Go to original source...
    24. Kriesi, H. K. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879 Go to original source...
    25. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalisation and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x Go to original source...
    26. Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso.
    27. Lee, M. J. (2006). The Populist Chameleon: The People's Party, Huey Long, George Wallace, and the Populist Argumentative Frame. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(4), 355-378. https://doi.org/1.1080/00335630601080385 Go to original source...
    28. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x Go to original source...
    29. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 Go to original source...
    30. Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism. World Politics, 62(2), 221-260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000043 Go to original source...
    31. Ramiro, L. (2016). Support for Radical Left Parties in Western Europe: Social Background, Ideology and Political Orientations. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000368 Go to original source...
    32. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
    33. Ringen, S. (1987). The Possibility of Politics. Oxford University Press.
    34. Rooduijn, M. (2014). The mesmerising message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies 62(4): 726-744. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.1207. Go to original source...
    35. Rooduijn, M., & Burgoon, B.M. (2018). The Paradox of Wellbeing: Do Unfavorable Socio-economic and Sociocultural Contexts Deepen or Dampen Radical Left and Right Voting among the Less Well-off? Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1720-1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720707 Go to original source...
    36. Rooduijn, M., & Pauwels. T. (2011). Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics, 34(6), 1272-1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.616665 Go to original source...
    37. Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro. A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. Retrieved September 5, 2020. (http://www.popu-list.org).
    38. Saxonberg, S., & Heinisch, R. (2022). Filling the Demand Gap: Explaining the Success of Centrist Entrepreneurial Populism in the Czech Republic. Europe-Asia Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2136624 Go to original source...
    39. Schumacher G & van Kersbergen, K. (2016). Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties? Party Politics 22(3):300-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549345 Go to original source...
    40. Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & van Droogenbroek. F. (2016). Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It? Political Research Quaterly, 69(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138 Go to original source...
    41. Stanley, B. (2008). The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95-110, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289 Go to original source...
    42. Swank, D. & Betz, H.G. (2003). Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review 1(2): 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.2.215 Go to original source...
    43. Škop, M. (2017). Zisky a ztráty voličů v roce 2017 oproti roku 2013. Retrieved December 5, 2020. (https://skop.eu/post/zisky-a-ztraty-volicu-2013-2017/).
    44. Taylor-Gooby, P., ed. (2004). New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    45. Tsatsanis, E. (2011). Hellenism under Siege: The National-populist Logic of Antiglobalisation Rhetoric in Greece. Journal of Political Ideologies, 16(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2011.540939 Go to original source...
    46. Vachudová, M.A. (2019). From Competition to Polarisation in Central Europe: How Populists Change Party Systems and the European Union. Polity, 51(4), 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1086/705704 Go to original source...
    47. van der Waal, J., de Koster, W., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). Three Worlds of Welfare Chauvinism? How Welfare Regimes Affect Support for Distributing Welfare to Immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785147 Go to original source...
    48. van Hauwaert, S.M., & van Kessel, S. (2018). Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross-national Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216 Go to original source...
    49. van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059829 Go to original source...
    50. Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807 Go to original source...
    51. ANO. (2017). "Teď nebo nikdy. Program hnutí ANO pro volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2017. Ten jediný program, který potřebujete." Retrieved October 810, 2020 (https://www.anobudelip.cz/file/edee/2017/09/program-hnuti-ano-pro-volby-do-poslanecke-snemovny.pdf).
    52. ANO. (2013). "Resortní program." Retrieved October 8, 2020 (https://www.anobudelip.cz/cs/o-nas/program/volby-2013/resortni-program/). Go to original source...
    53. ČSSD. (2017). "Dobrá země pro život. Volební program České strany sociálně-demokratické (ČSSD) pro volby 2017." Retrieved October 8, 2020 (https://www.cssd.cz/data/files/program-210x20-seda.pdf).
    54. ČSSD. (2013). "Prosadíme dobře fungující stát. Volební program ČSSD Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny PČR 25. -- 26. 10. 2013." Retrieved October 8, 2020 (http://www.cssd.cz/data/files/volebni_program.pdf).
    55. KSČM. (2017). "Jsme Váš hlas! Mír ve světě, spravedlnost a bezpečí doma. Volební program KSČM pro volby do Poslanecké sněmovny Parlamentu České Republiky 2017." Retrieved October 8, 2020 (https:www.kscm.cz/sites/default/files/soubory/Program%20KSČM/volebni_program_kscm_pro_volby_do_ps_pcr_2017.pdf).
    56. KSČM. (2013). "Program Pro Budoucnost." Retrieved October 8, 2020 (http://old.kscm.cz/viewDocument.asp?document=6541).
    57. ODS. (2017). "ODS Silný Program Pro Silné Česko." Retrieved October 8, 2020 (https://www.ods.cz/volby2017/program).
    58. ODS. (2013). "Volební Program. Neexistují levicová nebo pravicová témata. Existují jen levicová nebo správná řešení." Retrived October 8, 2020 (https://www.ods.cz/docs/programy/volebni-program-2013.pdf).
    59. SPD. (2017). "Volební Program SPD." Retrieved October 8, 20202 (http://web.archive.org/web/20171022212422/http://www.spd.cz/program).
    60. UPD. (2013). "Chceme zavést politický systém s důsledným oddělením moci výkonné, zákonodárné a soudní a s přímou odpovědností volených představitelů." Retreived October 8, 2020 (https://docplayer.cz/2506345-Chceme-zavest-politicky-system-s-duslednym-oddelenim-moci-vykonne-zakonodarne-a-soudni-a-s-primou-odpovednosti-volenych-predstavitelu.html).

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content