Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2009, 45(3): 549-570 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.3.03

Internationalisation of the State in the Czech Republic: Igniting the Competition for Foreign Investment in the Visegrád Four Region

Jan Drahokoupil
University of Mannheim

This article focuses on a key episode in the Czech political-economic history of the 1990s, the abandonment of 'Czech capitalism', and the switch towards the competition state and an economic model based on foreign investment. The account of the U-turn in the policy approach to foreign investors identifies domestic actors that have had a crucial role in organising political support for the competition state. These actors, which the author calls the 'comprador' service sector, have an important role in mediating the structural power of transnational investors and translating it into other forms of power within the state. These actors also had a major role in shaping the U-turn in policy in the Czech Republic.

Keywords: : economic policy, state, class, foreign direct investment, Czech Republic

Published: June 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drahokoupil, J. (2009). Internationalisation of the State in the Czech Republic: Igniting the Competition for Foreign Investment in the Visegrád Four Region. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 45(3), 549-570. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.3.03
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Appel, H. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Go to original source...
    2. Bandelj, N. 2007. From Communists to Foreign Capitalists: The Social Foundations of Foreign Investment in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    3. Baran, P. 1957. The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
    4. Berend, I. T. 1996. Central and Eastern Europe, 1944-1993: Detour from the Periphery to the Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    5. Bohle, D. 2000. 'Internationalisation: An Issue Neglected in the Path-dependency Approach to Post-communist Transformation.' Pp. 235-261 in Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences, edited by M. Dobry. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Go to original source...
    6. Bohle, D. 2002. Europas neue Peripherie: Polens transformation und transnationale integration. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
    7. Bohle, D. 2006. 'Neoliberal Hegemony, Transnational Capital and the Terms of EU's Eastwards Expansion.' Capital and Class 88: 57-86. Go to original source...
    8. Bohle, D. and B. Greskovits. 2006. 'Capitalism without Compromise: Strong Business and Weak Labor in Eastern Europe's New Transnational Industries.' Studies in Comparative International Development 41(1): 3-25. Go to original source...
    9. Bohle, D. and B. Greskovits. 2007. 'Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism, and Neocorporatism: Paths towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe.' West European Politics 30 (3): 443-466. Go to original source...
    10. Bohle, D. and D. Husz. 2005. 'Whose Europe Is It? Interest Group Action in Accession Negotiations: The Cases of Competition Policy and Labor Migration.' Politique Européenne 15: 85-112. Go to original source...
    11. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
    12. Cooke, W. N. 2001. 'The Effects of Labour Costs and Workplace Constraints on Foreign Direct Investment among Highly Industrialized Countries.' International Journal of Human Resource Management 12 (5): 697-716. Go to original source...
    13. Cooke, W. N. and D. S. Noble. 1998. 'Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad.' British Journal of Industrial Relations 36 (4): 581-609. Go to original source...
    14. CzechInvest. 2002. CzechInvest: The Investment Gateway to the Czech Republic, 1992-2002. Prague: CzechInvest.
    15. De Boer-Ashworth, E. 2000. The Global Political Economy and Post-1989 Change: The Place of the Central European Transition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    16. DiMaggio, P. 1988. 'Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.' Pp. 3-22 Institutional Patterns and Culture, edited by L. G. Zucker. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
    17. Dobry, M. (ed.) 2000. Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    18. Drahokoupil, J. 2007. 'Analyzing the Capitalist State in Post-socialism: Towards the Porterian Workfare Postnational Regime.' International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (2): 401-424. Go to original source...
    19. Drahokoupil, J. 2008. Globalization and the State in Central and Eastern Europe: The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    20. Drahokoupil, J. 2009. 'After Transition: Varieties of Political-economic Development in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.' Comparative European Politics 7 (2): 279-298. Go to original source...
    21. Drahokoupil, J., B. van Apeldoorn and L. Horn. 2008. 'Introduction.' Pp. 1-17 in Contradictions and Limits of Neoliberal European Governance: From Lisbon to Lisbon, edited by B. van Apeldoorn, J. Drahokoupil and L Horn. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Go to original source...
    22. Eden, L., S. Lemway and D. A. Schuler. 2005. 'From the Obsolescing Bargain to the Political Bargaining Model.' Pp. 251-272 in International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century, edited by R. Grosse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    23. Eyal, G., I. Szelényi and E. R. Townsley. 1998. Making Capitalism without Capitalists: Class Formation and Elite Struggles in Post-communist Central Europe. London and New York: Verso.
    24. Farnsworth, K. 2004. Corporate Power and Social Policy in a Global Economy: British Welfare under the Influence. Bristol: The Policy Press. Go to original source...
    25. Gandullia, L. 2004. 'Tax System and Reforms in EU New Member Countries: An Overview.' Università di Genova, DISEFIN - Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Finanziarie Working Paper, 10/2004.
    26. Gereffi, G. 1995. 'Global Production Systems and Third World Development.' Pp. 100-142 in Global Change, Regional Response, edited by B. Stallings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    27. Gill, S. and D. Law. 1989. 'Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital.' International Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 475-499. Go to original source...
    28. Gough, I. 1979. The Political Economy of the Welfare State. London: Macmillan. Go to original source...
    29. Gould, J. 2001. Beyond Creating Owners: Privatization and Democratization in the Slovak and Czech Republics, 1990-1998. Unpublished PhD, Columbia University.
    30. Gowan, P. 1995. 'Neo-liberal Theory and Practice for Eastern Europe.' New Left Review 1 (213): 3-60.
    31. Gowan, P. 1996. 'Eastern Europe, Western Power and Neo-liberalism.' New Left Review 1 (216): 129-140.
    32. Haas, P. M. 1992. 'Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.' International Organization 46 (2): 1-35. Go to original source...
    33. Hall, P. A. and D. W. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    34. Hay, C. 2002. Political Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.
    35. Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    36. Holman, O. 1998. 'Integrating Eastern Europe: EU Expansion and the Double Transformation in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary.' International Journal of Political Economy 28 (2): 12-43. Go to original source...
    37. Holman, O. 2004. 'Integrating Peripheral Europe: The Different Roads to "Security and Stability" in Southern and Central Europe.' Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (2): 208-236. Go to original source...
    38. Jensen, C. 2006. 'Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Transition: Panacea or Pain Killer?' Europe-Asia Studies 58 (6): 881-902. Go to original source...
    39. Jensen, N. M. 2003. 'Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment.' International Organization 57 (3): 587-616. Go to original source...
    40. Kalb, D. 1997. Expanding Class: Power and Everyday Politics in Industrial Communities, The Netherlands, 1850-1950. Durham: Duke University Press.
    41. Kupka, M. 1992. 'Transformation of Ownership in Czechoslovakia.' Soviet Studies 44 (2): 297-311. Go to original source...
    42. Lane, D. 2005. 'Revolution, Class and Globalization in the Transition from State Socialism.' European Societies 7 (1): 131-155. Go to original source...
    43. Lane, D. 2006. 'From State Socialism to Capitalism: The Role of Class and the World System.' Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39: 135-152. Go to original source...
    44. Machonin, P., M. Tuček and M. Nekola. 2006. 'The Czech Economic Elite after Fifteen Years of Post-socialist Transformation.' Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 42 (3): 537-556. Go to original source...
    45. McDermott, G. A. 2002. Embedded Politics: Industrial Networks and Institutional Change in Postcommunism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Go to original source...
    46. Meaney, C. S. 1995. 'Foreign Experts, Capitals, and Competing Agendas: Privatization in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary.' Comparative Political Studies 28 (2): 275-305. Go to original source...
    47. Meyer, K. E. and C. Jensen. 2005. 'Foreign Direct Investment and Government Policy in Central and Eastern Europe.' Pp. 119-146 in International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century, edited by R. Grosse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    48. MIGA-FIAS. 2005. Competing for FDI: Inside the Operations of Four National Investment Promotion Agencies. Washington: Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency and Foreign Investment Advisory Service.
    49. Myant, M. 1999. 'Inward Investment and Structural Transformation.' Pp. 61-84 in Institutional Change and Industrial Development in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by A. Lorentzen, B. Widmaier and M. Laki. Aldershot: Ashgate. Go to original source...
    50. Myant, M. 2003. The Rise and Fall of Czech Capitalism: Economic Development in the Czech Republic since 1989. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Go to original source...
    51. Myant, M. and J. Drahokoupil. 2010. Economics of Transition. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, forthcoming.
    52. Offe, C. and V. Ronge. 1975. 'Theses on the Theory of the State.' New German Critique 6: 137-147. Go to original source...
    53. Orenstein, M. A. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Go to original source...
    54. Pavlínek, P. 2002. 'Restructuring the Central and Eastern European Automobile Industry: Legacies, Trends, and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment.' Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 43 (1): 41-77. Go to original source...
    55. Poulantzas, N. 1976. The Crisis of the Dictatorships. London: New Left Books.
    56. Przeworski, A. and M. Wallerstein. 1988. 'Structural Dependence of the State on Capital.' The American Political Science Review 82 (1): 11-29. Go to original source...
    57. Rodrik, D. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington: Institute for International Economics.
    58. Schwarz, J. 2003. 'Transformace, reforma a třetí cesta.' (Reform, Transition and the Third Way) Politická ekonomie 3: 407-421. Go to original source...
    59. Shafer, D. M. 1994. Winners and Losers: How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Go to original source...
    60. Shields, S. 2003. 'The "Charge of the Right Brigade": Transnational Social Forces and the Neoliberal Configuration of Poland's Transition.' New Political Economy 8 (2): 225-244. Go to original source...
    61. Shields, S. 2004. 'Global Restructuring and the Polish State: Transition, Transformation, or Transnationalization?' Review of International Political Economy 11 (1): 132-154. Go to original source...
    62. Smith, N. J.-A. 2005. Showcasing Globalisation? The Political Economy of the Irish Republic. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    63. Stark, D. and L. Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    64. van der Pijl, K. 2001. 'What Happened to the European Option for Eastern Europe?' Pp. 185-204 in Social Forces in the Making of the New Europe, edited by A. Bieler and A. D. Morton. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave. Go to original source...
    65. van der Pijl, K. 2006. Global Rivalries: From the Cold War to Iraq. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
    66. Vernon, R. 1998. In the Hurricane's Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
    67. Watson, M. and C. Hay. 2003. 'The Discourse of Globalisation and the Logic of No Alternative: Rendering the Contingent Necessary in the Political Economy of New Labour.' Policy and Politics 31 (3): 289-305. Go to original source...
    68. Wolf, E. R. 1990. 'Facing Power - Old Insights, New Questions.' American Anthropologist 92 (3): 586-596. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content