Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2026.023

Participation as a Shared Lever for Civic and Environmental Education: Student Voice, Empowerment, and Perceived Control in the Czech Case and Central European Perspective

Roman Kroufek ORCID...1, Petr Bláha ORCID...1, Vladimír Naxera ORCID...2
1 Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
2 University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Czech Republic

Civic and environmental education are often institutionally separated, although many contemporary public challenges—including climate adaptation, land use, mobility, energy transitions, and local environmental conflicts—require both democratic deliberation and socio-environmental action. This article develops an integrative conceptual review of student participation as a shared mechanism that may connect these domains. Rather than treating participation as a universally beneficial educational practice, we conceptualise it as an institutional opportunity structure whose effects depend on its quality, consequentiality, equity, and legitimacy. We propose a mechanism whereby consequential participation in classroom, school, and community settings supports agency-related beliefs, particularly psychological empowerment, perceived control, action self-efficacy, civic and political efficacy, and collective efficacy. These beliefs may, in turn, increase the likelihood of both civic engagement and environmental action. We further argue that environmental engagement also depends on an affective pathway, particularly nature connectedness and place attachment, which complements—but cannot substitute for—agency-building forms of participation. Because the empirical evidence reviewed here is concentrated primarily in Czechia, the article treats the Czech case as an analytically useful Central European case rather than as representative of the region as a whole. We identify segmentation, tokenism,\\r\\ninequality, low institutional trust, and disputes concerning legitimacy as key boundary conditions. The article’s contribution lies in specifying how participation may bridge civic and environmental education, the conditions under which it may fail, and the implications of these dynamics for future sociological and educational research on youth agency in Central Europe.

Keywords: student participation, student voice, empowerment, perceived control, collective efficacy, civic education, environmental education, Czechia, Central Europe, inequality

Received: January 27, 2026; Revised: June 30, 2026; Accepted: July 1, 2026; Prepublished online: July 27, 2026 

Download citation

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Go to original source...
  2. Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2023). A systematic mixed studies review of civic engagement outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 29(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2135688 Go to original source...
  3. Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 Go to original source...
  4. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x Go to original source...
  5. Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z Go to original source...
  6. Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., Bonhomme, M., Cox, C., & Bascopé, M. (2015). Mitigating the political participation gap from the school: The roles of civic knowledge and classroom climate. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.933199 Go to original source...
  7. Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and promoting engagement with climate change. People and Nature, 2(3), 619-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10128 Go to original source...
  8. Christens, B. D., Peterson, N. A., & Speer, P. W. (2011). Community participation and psychological empowerment: Testing reciprocal causality using a cross-lagged panel design and latent constructs. Health Education & Behavior, 38(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198110372880 Go to original source...
  9. Činčera, J., Johnson, B., Kroufek, R., & Šimonová, P. (2020). Values education in outdoor environmental education programs from the perspective of practitioners. Sustainability, 12(11), 4700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114700 Go to original source...
  10. Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353 Go to original source...
  11. Doležalová Křepelková, Š., Krajhanzl, J., & Kroufek, R. (2020). The influence of interaction with nature in childhood on future pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 536-550. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.536 Go to original source...
  12. Gallay, E., Shantz, E., Flanagan, C., Pykett, A., & Voelker, L. (2025). Environmental civic science: Civic and scientific literacy on socio-environmental issues for the common good. Theory Into Practice, 64(2), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2025.2453365 Go to original source...
  13. Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034 Go to original source...
  14. Hamann, K. R. S., Wullenkord, M. C., Reese, G., & Van Zomeren, M. (2024). Believing that we can change our world for the better: A Triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) framework of self-efficacy beliefs in the context of collective social and ecological aims. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(1), 11-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231178056 Go to original source...
  15. Hess, D. E. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30(1), 10-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2002.10473177 Go to original source...
  16. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 Go to original source...
  17. Hoskins, B. L., Janmaat, J. G., & Villalba, E. (2012). Learning citizenship through social participation outside and inside school: An international, multilevel study of young people's learning of citizenship. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 419-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.550271 Go to original source...
  18. Hoskins, B., & Janmaat, J. G. (2016). Educational trajectories and inequalities of political engagement among adolescents in England. Social Science Research, 56, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.11.005 Go to original source...
  19. Hoskins, B., Janmaat, J. G., & Melis, G. (2017). Tackling inequalities in political socialisation: A systematic analysis of access to and mitigation effects of learning citizenship at school. Social Science Research, 68, 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.09.001 Go to original source...
  20. Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students' commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 738-766. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316951 Go to original source...
  21. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 Go to original source...
  22. Křepelková, Š., Činčera, J., & Kroufek, R. (2019). Becoming a global citizen through participation in the Global Storylines program. Sustainability, 11(15), 4162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154162 Go to original source...
  23. Kudrnáč, A. (2017). The impact of open classroom climate and classroom socio-economic composition on civic knowledge and attitudes towards voting. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 53(2), 209-240. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2017.53.2.314 Go to original source...
  24. Kudrnáč, A., & Lyons, P. (2018). Can political inequality be reduced in the classroom? Testing the compensation hypothesis and the BFLPE on youth civic competence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(2), 204-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1400444 Go to original source...
  25. Mager, U., & Nowak, P. (2012). Effects of student participation in decision making at school: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001 Go to original source...
  26. Mitra, D. L. (2001). Opening the floodgates: Giving students a voice in school reform. Forum, 43(2), 91-94. https://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.14 Go to original source...
  27. Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209334577 Go to original source...
  28. Ojala, M. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004 Go to original source...
  29. Poškus, M. S. (2024). Political beliefs as a moderator for predicting environmental citizenship through environmental education and environmental literacy. Social Sciences, 13, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010013 Go to original source...
  30. Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2013). The relationship between political participation intentions of adolescents and a participatory democratic climate at school in 35 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.830097 Go to original source...
  31. Šerek, J., Macháčková, H., & Macek, P. (2017). The chicken or egg question of adolescents' political involvement: Longitudinal analysis of the relation between adolescents' political participation, political efficacy, and interest in politics. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(4), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000297 Go to original source...
  32. Šimonová, P., Činčera, J., Kroufek, R., Křepelková, Š., & Hadjichambis, A. (2019). Active Citizens: Evaluation of a community-based education program. Sustainability, 11(3), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030663 Go to original source...
  33. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 Go to original source...
  34. Teegelbeckers, J. Y., Nieuwelink, H., & Oostdam, R. J. (2023). School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 39, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511 Go to original source...
  35. Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school's role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_7 Go to original source...
  36. Trott, C. D. (2020). Children's constructive climate change engagement: Empowering awareness, agency, and action. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 532-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1675594 Go to original source...
  37. van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as 'passionate economists': A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430835 Go to original source...
  38. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 Go to original source...
  39. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.