Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2023, 59(1): 3-30 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2023.001

The Stability of Co-residential Partnerships after First Birth: Did the ‘Protective Effect of Marriage’ Increase after 1989?

Marcela Trávníčková, Martin Kreidl
Fakulta sociální studií, Masarykova univerzita, Brno

This article investigates the stability of co-residential partnerships after first birth in the Czech Republic. It explores the ‘marriage premium’, which refers to the advantage that children born to married parents have in comparison to other parental arrangements, and also highlights change in the ‘marriage premium’ after 1989. The analysis also examines the effect of marriage timing: Does the marriage premium differ between pre-birth and post-birth marriages? Did the effect of timing also change after 1989? The analysis is based on Czech GGS (Generations and Gender Survey) data from 2005. Direct marriages are the most stable unions, cohabitations are the least stable. Among couples who were not married, the odds of dissolution increased by 142 per cent (in comparison to marriages without pre-marital cohabitation). This ‘marriage premium’ increased after 1989. Marriage timing has come to play an increasingly important role. In the pre-1989 marriage cohort, pre-birth and post-birth marriage had the same stabilising effect. After 1989, however, pre-delivery wedding stabilises unions more than post-delivery legitimising marriages. We conclude that the era of highly individualised partnership choices has clearly shone a light on the consequences of these choices for subsequent union stability.

Keywords: marriage, cohabitation, coresident partnership, union instability

Received: October 5, 2020; Revised: January 2, 2023; Accepted: January 2, 2023; Prepublished online: February 7, 2023; Published: March 13, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Trávníčková, M., & Kreidl, M. (2023). The Stability of Co-residential Partnerships after First Birth: Did the ‘Protective Effect of Marriage’ Increase after 1989? Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 59(1), 3-30. doi: 10.13060/csr.2023.001
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Amato, P. R. 2000. "The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children." Journal of Marriage and Family 62 (4): 1269-1287, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x. Go to original source...
    2. Axinn, W., A. Thornton. 1992. "The Relationship between Cohabitation and Divorce: Selectivity or Causal Influence?" Demography 29: 357-374, https://doi.org/10.2307/2061823. Go to original source...
    3. Bernardi, F., J. Radl. 2014. "The Long-term Consequences of Parental Divorce for Children's Educational Attainment." Demographic Research 30: 1653-1680, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.61. Go to original source...
    4. Booth, A., J. N. Edwards. 1985. "Age at Marriage and Marital Instability." Journal of Marriage and Family 47 (1): 67-75, https://doi.org/10.2307/352069. Go to original source...
    5. Brons, A., A. C. Liefbroer, H. B. G. Ganzeboom. 2021. "Parental Socioeconomic Status and the Timing of First Marriage: What Is the Role of Unmarried Cohabitation? Results from a Cross-national Comparison." Demographic Research 45: 469-516, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.15. Go to original source...
    6. Brown, S. L., W. D. Manning, K. K. Payne. 2017. "Relationship Quality among Cohabiting versus Married Couples." Journal of Family Issues 38 (12): 1730-1753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236. Go to original source...
    7. Cleves, M. A., W. W. Gould, R. G. Gutierrez. 2004. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. United States of America: Stata Press.
    8. Craigie, T. L., J., Brooks-Gunn, J. Waldfogel. 2012. "Family Structure, Family Stability and Outcomes of Five-year-old Children." Families, Relationships and Societies 1 (1): 43-61, https://doi.org/10.1332/204674312X633153. Go to original source...
    9. CVVM. 2017. Postoje českých občanů k manželství a rodině - únor 2017 [online]. Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění, Sociologický ústav AV ČR [cit. 16. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/a2177/f9/ov170320.pdf.
    10. Dush, C. M. K., C. L. Cohan, P. R. Amato. 2003. "The Relationship between Cohabitation and Marital Quality: Change across Cohorts?" Journal of Marriage and Family 65 (3): 539-549, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00539.x. Go to original source...
    11. Fialová, L. 2006. "Trendy ve sňatkovém chování obyvatelstva České republiky ve 20. století." Demografie 48 (2): 97-108.
    12. Fialová, L., K. Kalibová. 2010. "Formování a rozpad partnerských svazků." Pp. 133-156 in B. Burcin, L. Fialová, J. Rychtaříková et al. Demografická situace České republiky. Proměny a kontexty 1993-2008. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    13. Formánková, L., A. Křížková. 2015. "Love Will Keep Us Apart? Understanding Living Apart Together Partnerships in the Post-state-socialist Czech Republic." Czech Sociological Review 51 (6): 993-1022, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2015.51.6.226. Go to original source...
    14. Fučík, P. 2018. "Vzdělání a riziko rozvodu." Pp. 109-121 in D. Hamplová, T. Katrňák (eds.). Na vzdělání záleží. Brno: CDK.
    15. Fučík, P., B. E. Chromková Manea, L. Rabušic. 2019. "K problému deinstitucionalizace manželství." Pp. 33-60 in L. Rabušic, Z. Kusá, B. Chromková Manea, K. Strapcová. 2019. Odděleně spolu? Česko a Slovensko optikou vývoje hodnot po roce 1991. Bratislava: Slovart.
    16. Generations and Gender Programme. 2020. About [online]. Generations and Gender Programme [cit. 24. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.ggp-i.org/form/.
    17. Hamplová, D. 2000. "Postoje k manželství a rodičovství." Pp. 67-98 in L. Fialová, D. Hamplová, M. Kučera, S. Vymětalová. Představy mladých lidí o manželství a rodičovství. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    18. Hamplová, D. 2003. "Preferované partnerské uspořádání: sociodemografické a hodnotové rozdíly." Demografie 45 (3): 166-176.
    19. Hamplová, D. 2007. "Děti bez manželství nebo bez otců?" Data a výzkum - SDA Info 1 (2): 141-154.
    20. Hamplová, D. 2018. "Rodinné chování a hodnoty a vzdělání." Pp. 75-88 in D. Hamplová, T. Katrňák (eds.). Na vzdělání záleží. Brno: CDK.
    21. Hărăguş, M. 2015. "From Cohabitation to Marriage when a Child Is on the Way. A Comparison of three Former Socialist Countries: Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary." Journal of Comparative Family Studies 46 (3): 329-350, https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.46.3.329. Go to original source...
    22. Härkönen, J., F. Bernardi, D. Boertien. 2017. "Family Dynamics and Child Outcomes: An Overview of Research and Open Questions." European Journal of Population 33 (2): 163-184, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9424-6. Go to original source...
    23. Härkönen, J., M. D. Brons, J. Dronkers. 2021. "Family Forerunners? Parental Separation and Partnership Formation in 16 Countries." Journal of Marriage and Family 83 (1): 119-136, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12682. Go to original source...
    24. Härkönen, J., J. Dronkers. 2006. "Stability and Change in the Educational Gradient of Divorce. A Comparison of Seventeen Countries." European Sociological Review 22 (5): 501-517, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl011. Go to original source...
    25. Hasmanová Marhánková, J., M. Kreidl. 2012. Proměny partnerství: Životní dráhy a partnerství v české společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    26. Hastings, O. P., D. Schneider. 2021. "Family Structure and Inequalities in Parents' Financial Investments in Children." Journal of Marriage and Family 83 (3): 717-736, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12741. Go to original source...
    27. Hašková, H. 2014. "Odchod z domova rodičů." Pp. 59-78 in H. Hašková (ed.) et al. Vlastní cestou. Životní dráhy v pozdně moderní společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    28. Heintz-Martin, V., A. Langmeyer. 2020. "Economic Situation, Financial Strain and Child Wellbeing in Stepfamilies and Single-Parent Families in Germany." Journal of Family and Economic Issues 41 (3), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-019-09653-z. Go to original source...
    29. Heuveline, P., J. M. Timberlake, F. F. Furstenberg. 2003. "Shifting Child Rearing Single Mothers: Results from 17 Western Nations." Population and Development Review 29: 47-71, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00047.x. Go to original source...
    30. Heuveline, P., J. M. Timberlake. 2004. "The Role of Cohabitation in Family Formation: The United States in Comparative Perspective." Journal of Marriage and Family 66 (5): 1214-1230, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x. Go to original source...
    31. Holland, J. A. 2013. "Love, Marriage, then the Baby Carriage? Marriage Timing and Childbearing in Sweden." Demographic Research 29: 275-306, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.11. Go to original source...
    32. Chaloupková, J. 2007. "Diferenciace motivů svobodného mateřství: proč neprovdané matky nevstoupily před narozením svého prvního dítěte do manželství?" Data a výzkum - SDA Info 1 (2): 127-140.
    33. Chaloupková, J. 2010. "The De-standardisation of Early Family Trajectories in the Czech Republic: A Cross-cohort Comparison." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 46 (3): 427-451, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2010.46.3.05. Go to original source...
    34. Chaloupková, J. 2011. "Nejdříve dítě, potom svatba? Rodinné dráhy neprovdaných matek." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 12 (2): 30-39.
    35. James, S. L., B. A. Beattie 2012. "Reassessing the Link between Women's Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Quality." Social Forces 91 (2): 635-662, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos126. Go to original source...
    36. Jann, B. 2004. "Stata Tip 8: Splitting Time-span Records with Categorical Time-varying Covariates." The Stata Journal 4 (2): 221-222, https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0400400212. Go to original source...
    37. Jose, A., K. D. O'Leary, A. Moyer. 2010. "Does Premarital Cohabitation Predict Subsequent Marital Stability and Marital Quality? A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 105-116, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00686.x. Go to original source...
    38. Katrňák, T. et al. 2010. Na prahu dospělosti. Praha/Brno: Dokořán/Masarykova univerzita.
    39. Kearney, M. S., P. B. Levine. 2017. "The Economics of Nonmarital Childbearing and the Marriage Premium for Children." Annual Review of Economics 9 (1): 327-352, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103749. Go to original source...
    40. Kerrigan, S., J. Bailey. 2021. "Does Premarital Cohabitation Increase the Likelihood of Future Marital Dissolution?" SN Social Sciences 1: 123, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00146-1. Go to original source...
    41. Kiernan, K. 2002. "Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, Issues, and Implications. Pp. 3-31 in A. Booth, A. C. Crouter (eds.). Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation on Families, Children and Social Policy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    42. Klímová Chaloupková, J., H. Hašková. 2020. "The Diversity of Pathways to Childlessness in the Czech Republic: The Union Histories of Childless Men and Women." Advances in Life Course Research 46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100363. Go to original source...
    43. Koops, J. C., A. C. Liefbroer, A.H. Gauthier. 2021a. "Having a Child within a Cohabiting Union in Europe and North America: What Is the Role of Parents' Socio-economic Status?" Population Space and Place 27: e2434, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2434. Go to original source...
    44. Koops, J. C., A. C. Liefbroer, A. H. Gauthier. 2021b. "Socio-Economic Differences in the Prevalence of Single Motherhood in North America and Europe." European Journal of Population 37: 825-849, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09591-3. Go to original source...
    45. Kreidl, M. 2012. "Educational Stratification of Marriage Entry under Different Political and Economic Regimes: Evidence from the Czech Republic during the Second Half of the 20th Century." Population Review 51 (2): 151-178. Go to original source...
    46. Kreidl, M., M. Štípková. 2012. "Výskyt a načasování nesezdaných soužití v současné ČR." Demografie 54 (2): 120-137.
    47. Kreidl, M., M. Štípková, B. Hubatková. 2017. "Parental Separation and Children's Education in Comparative Perspective: Does the Burden Disappear when Separation is More Common?" Demographic Research 36: 73-110, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.3. Go to original source...
    48. Kreidl, M., Z. Žilinčíková. 2021. "How Does Cohabitation Change People's Attitudes toward Family Dissolution." European Sociological Review 37 (4): 541-554, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa073. Go to original source...
    49. Křesťanová, J. 2020. "Trends in Marriage and Divorce Rate in the Past 30 Years (1989-2019)." Demografie 62: 253-267.
    50. Kuperberg, A. 2014. "Age at Coresidence, Premarital Cohabitation, and Marriage Dissolution: 1985-2009." Family Relations 76: 352-369, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12092. Go to original source...
    51. Lelièvre, É., A. Bringé. 1998. Practical Guide to Event History Analysis using SAS, TDA, STATA. Paris: INED.
    52. Liefbroer, A. C., E. Dourleijn. 2006. "Unmarried Cohabitation and Union Stability: Testing the Role of Diffusion Using Data from 16 European Countries." Demography 43 (2): 203-221, https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0018. Go to original source...
    53. Lillard, L. A., M. J. Brien, L. J. Waite. 1995. "Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Dissolution: A Matter of Self-Selection?" Demography 32: 437-457, https://doi.org/10.2307/2061690. Go to original source...
    54. Manning, W. D. 2001. "Childbearing in Cohabiting Unions: Racial and Ethnic Differences." Family Planning Perspective 33: 217-222, https://doi.org/10.2307/2673785. Go to original source...
    55. Manning, W. D. 2004. "Children and the Stability of Cohabiting Couples." Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 674-689, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00046.x. Go to original source...
    56. Manning, W. D. 2015. "Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing." The Future of Children 25 (2): 51-66, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43581972. Go to original source...
    57. Manning, W. D., J. A. Cohen. 2012. "Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Dissolution: An Examination of Recent Marriages." Journal of Marriage and Family 74 (2): 377-387, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.x. Go to original source...
    58. Manning, W. D., P. J. Smock, D. Majumdar. 2004. "The Relative Stability of Cohabiting and Marital Unions for Children." Population Research and Policy Review 23 (2): 135-159, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000019916.29156.a7. Go to original source...
    59. Manlove, J., E. Wildsmith, E. Ikramullah, S. Ryan, E. Holcombe, M. Scott, K. Peterson. 2012. "Union Transitions Following the Birth of a Child to Cohabiting Parents." Population Research and Policy Review 31 (3): 361-386, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-012-9231-z. Go to original source...
    60. McLanahan, S., I. Sawhill. 2015. "Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited: Introducing the Issue. The Future of Children 25 (2): 3-9, https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2015.0009. Go to original source...
    61. Morávková, H., M. Kreidl. 2017. "Partnerské dráhy prvorodiček bez partnera ve společné domácnosti." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 53 (4): 565-591, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2017.53.4.358. Go to original source...
    62. Možný, I. 2002. Česká společnost. Praha: Portál.
    63. Možný, I. 2004. "The Czech Family: Slouching towards the Open European Society of Late Modernity." Pp. 15-40 in P. Mareš et al. Society, Reproduction, and Contemporary Challenges. Brno: Barrister and Principal.
    64. Možný, I., L. Rabušic. 1992. "Unmarried Cohabitation in Czechoslovakia." Czechoslovak Sociological Review 28: 107-117.
    65. Musick, K., K. Michelmore. 2015. "Change in the Stability of Marital and Cohabiting Unions Following the Birth of a Child." Demography 52: 1463-1485, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0425-y. Go to original source...
    66. Oppenheimer, V. K. 1988. "A Theory of Marriage Timing." American Journal of Sociology 94 (3): 563-591, https://doi.org/10.1086/229030. Go to original source...
    67. Pakosta, P. 2008. "Rozvodovost a vzdělání obou manželů." Demografie: Revue pro výzkum populačního vývoje. Praha: Český statistický úřad 50 (1): 64-70.
    68. Pařízková, A. 2012. "Vývoj sociologického pohledu na životní cyklus a životní dráhy." Pp. 22-37 in M. Kreidl, J. Hasmanová Marhánková (eds.). Proměny partnerství. Životní dráhy a partnerství v české společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    69. Popenoe, D. 2009. "Cohabitation, Marriage, and Child Wellbeing: A Cross-National Perspective." Society 46 (5): 429-436, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9242-5. Go to original source...
    70. Rabušic, L., I. Možný. 1998. "Česká rodina, sňatkový trh a reprodukční klima." Pp. 92-110 in J. Večerník, P. Matějů (eds.). Zpráva o vývoji české společnosti 1989-1998. Praha: Academia.
    71. Raley, K., M. Sweeney. 2020. "Divorce, Repartnering, and Stepfamilies: A Decade in Review." Journal of Marriage and Family 82 (1): 81-99, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12651. Go to original source...
    72. Reinhold, S. 2010. "Reassessing the Link between Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Instability." Demography 47 (3): 719-733, https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0122. Go to original source...
    73. Ribar, D. C. 2015. "Why Marriage Matters for Child Wellbeing." The Future of Children 25 (2): 11-27, https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2015.0010. Go to original source...
    74. Rosenfeld, M. J., K. Roesler. 2019. "Cohabitation Experience and Cohabitation's Association With Marital Dissolution." Journal of Marriage and Family 81 (1): 42-58, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12530. Go to original source...
    75. Sassler, S., D. T. Lichter. 2020. "Cohabitation and Marriage: Complexity and Diversity in Union-Formation Patterns." Journal of Marriage and Family 82 (2): 35-61, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12617. Go to original source...
    76. Sobotka, T., A. Šťastná, K. Zeman, D. Hamplová, V. Kantorová. 2008. "Czech Republic A Rapid Transformation of Fertility and Family Behaviour after the Collapse of State Socialism." Demographic Research 19: 403-454, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.14. Go to original source...
    77. Sobotka, T., L. Toulemon. 2008. "Overview Chapter 4: Changing Family and Partnership Behaviour: Common Trends and Persistent Diversity across Europe." Demographic Research 19 (6): 85-138, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6. Go to original source...
    78. Šprocha, B. 2021. "The Continuing Transformation of Nuptiality and Divorce in Czechia and Slovakia After 1989 in a Cohort Perspective." Demografie 63: 91-104.
    79. Šťastná, A. 2005. "Mezigenerační přenos rozvodového chování na příkladu České republiky a v mezinárodním srovnání." Demografie 47: 21-31.
    80. Štípková, M. 2015. "Ideational and Economic Causes of the Rise in Non-marital Childbearing in the Czech Republic." European Journal of Population 31: 473-494, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9350-4. Go to original source...
    81. Štípková, M., M. Kreidl. 2012. "Proměna načasování událostí životních drah." Pp. 38-72 in J. Hasmanová Marhánková, M. Kreidl (eds.). Proměny partnerství. Životní dráhy a partnerství v české společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    82. Torche, F., A. Abufhele. 2021. "The Normativity of Marriage and the Marriage Premium for Children's Outcomes." American Journal of Sociology 126 (4): 931-968, https://doi.org/10.1086/713382. Go to original source...
    83. Trávníčková, M., M. Kreidl. 2021. "Slábne v ČR mezigenerační přenos rozvodu?" Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 57 (5): 531-555, https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2021.041. Go to original source...
    84. Vašková, R. 2006. "Rozhodovací procesy-náctiletých těhotných dívek vedoucí k volbě časného rodičovství." Pp. 79-117 in D. Hamplová, P. Šalamounová, G. Šamanová (eds.). Životní cyklus-sociologické a demografické perspektivy. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    85. Vaus, D. de, L. Qu, R. Weston. 2005. "The Disappearing Link between Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Stability." Journal of Population Research 22 (2): 99-118, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031824. Go to original source...
    86. Vohlídalová, M. 2014. "Partnerství a vybrané partnerské tranzice." Pp. 79-102 in H. Hašková (ed.) et al. Vlastní cestou. Životní dráhy v pozdně moderní společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    87. Wolfinger, N. H. 1999. "Trends in the Intergenerational Transmission of Divorce." Demography 36: 415-420, https://doi.org/10.2307/2648064. Go to original source...
    88. Wu, L. L., K. Musick. 2008. "Stability of Marital and Cohabiting Unions Following a First Birth." Population Research and Policy Review 27 (6): 713-727, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9093-6. Go to original source...
    89. Yamaguchi, K. 1991. Event History Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
    90. Zartler, U. "Children and Parents after Separation." Pp. 300-313 in N. F. Schneider, M. Kreyenfeld (eds.). Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Cheltenham Edward Elgar, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00029. Go to original source...
    91. Žilinčíková, Z. 2017. "Do Children Matter for the Stability of Cohabitation? A Cross-National Comparison." Population 72 (4): 649-670.
    92. Žilinčíková, Z., N. Hiekel. 2018. "Transition from Cohabitation to Marriage. The Role of Marital Attitudes in Seven Western and Eastern European Countries." Comparative Population Studies 43, https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2018-04. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content