Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2011, 47(6): 1151-1190 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.6.03

Representative versus Responsible Government and May's Law: The Case of the Czech Christian Democratic Party

Lukáš Linek, Pat Lyons
Institute of Sociology AS CR, Prague

The representative vs responsible government thesis of Peter Mair argues that one of the main causes of the weakening of democracy is the increasing tension between the representative and governance functions performed by parties. The consequences of this widening gap in roles are increasingly evident, however, little is known about the intra-party foundations of this trend. This study using May's law and a theoretically informed case study of the Czech Christian Democratic Party (KDU-ČSL) demonstrates that (1) the opinion structure with a governance rather than representation oriented party is largely homogeneous revealing the origins of the representation deficit; and (2) the observed opinion differences among members of a party frequently in government have their origins in society rather than within the party showing that internal party life is failing in its representation function. These two results demonstrate that fundamental changes in party system have intra-party foundations.

Keywords: representative versus responsible government, party members,
May's Law, policy positions, Czech Christian Democratic Party

Keywords: : representative versus responsible government, party members, May's Law, policy positions, Czech Christian Democratic Party

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Linek, L., & Lyons, P. (2011). Representative versus Responsible Government and May's Law: The Case of the Czech Christian Democratic Party. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review47(6), 1151-1190. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.6.03
Download citation

References

  1. Balík, Stanislav and Jiří Hanuš. 2007. Katolická církev v Československu 1945-1989. (The Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia 1945-1989) Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  2. Butler, David A. 1960. 'The Paradox of Party Difference.' American Behavioral Scientist 4 (3): 3-5. Go to original source...
  3. Costantini, Edmond. 1963. 'Intraparty Attitude Conflict: Democratic Party Leadership in California.' Western Political Quarterly 16 (4): 956-972. Go to original source...
  4. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
  5. Duverger, Maurice. [1954] 1964. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. 3rd edition. London: Methuen.
  6. Enyedi, Zsolt and Lukáš Linek. 2008. 'Searching for the Right Organization: Ideology and Party Structure in East-Central Europe.' Party Politics 14 (4): 455-477. Go to original source...
  7. Epstein, Leon D. 1965. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  8. Fiala, Petr, Jiří Foral, Karel Konečný, Pavel Marek, Michal Pehr and Miloš Trapl. 2008. Český politický katolicismus 1848-2005. (Czech Political Catholicism 1848-2005) Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  9. Fiala, Petr, Miroslav Mareš and Pavel Pšeja. 1999. 'The Development of Political Parties and the Party System.' Pp. 273-294 in Ten Years of Rebuilding Capitalism: Czech Society after 1989, edited by J. Večerník and P. Matějů. Prague: Academia.
  10. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2011. 'Why There Is (Almost) No Christian Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.' Party Politics. Retrieved 10 June 2011 (http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/06/09/1354068811407596.full.pdf+html).
  11. Haute, van Emilie and R. Kenneth Carty. 2011. 'Ideological Misfits: A Distinctive Class of Party Member.' Party Politics. Retrieved 9 June 2011 (http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/06/08/1354068810395058.full.pdf+html).
  12. Herrera, Richard and Melanie K. Taylor. 1994. 'The Structure of Opinion in American Political Parties.' Political Studies 42 (4): 676-689. Go to original source...
  13. Iversen, Torben. 1994. 'The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilization Effects.' Comparative Political Studies 27 (2): 155-189. Go to original source...
  14. Jackson, John S., Barbara L. Brown and David Bositis. 1982. 'Herbert McClosky and friends revisited; 1980 Democratic and Republican Party Elites Compared to the Mass Publics.' American Politics Quarterly 10 (2): 158-180. Go to original source...
  15. Kennedy, Fiachra, Pat Lyons and Peter Fitzgerald. 2006. 'Pragmatists, Ideologues and the General Law of Curvilinear Disparity: The Case of the Irish Labour Party.' Political Studies 54 (4): 786-805. Go to original source...
  16. Key, Valdimer O. [1942] 1958. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. 4th edition. New York: Crowell.
  17. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. 'The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited.' Political Studies 37 (3): 400-421. Go to original source...
  18. Kostelecký, Tomáš. 2002. Political Parties after Communism: Developments in East-Central Europe. Washington, DC, and Baltimore, MD: Woodrow Wilson Centre/Johns Hopkins University Press.
  19. Linek, Lukáš. 2011. 'The Czech Republic.' European Journal of Political Research 50 (7-8): 948-954. Go to original source...
  20. Linek, Lukáš and Pat Lyons. 2008. 'Does Party Organization Still Matter in the Czech Republic? An Examination of the Czech Christian Democratic Party.' Transitions 48 (1): 103-131.
  21. Linek, Lukáš and Štěpán Pecháček. 2006. 'Základní charakteristiky členské základny KDU-ČSL.' (The Basic Characteristics of the Membership Base of KDU-ČSL) Sociologické studie 6:06. Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
  22. Lukeš, Bohumil. 2004. 'Československá strana lidová.' (Czechoslovak People's Party) Pp. 1283-1306 in Politické strany II. 1938-2004, edited by J. Malíř and P. Marek. Brno: Doplněk.
  23. Mair, Peter. 2005. 'Democracy Beyond Parties.' CSD Working Paper 05/06. Irvine, CA: Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California.
  24. Mair, Peter. 2008. 'The Challenge to Party Government.' West European Politics 31 (1 /2): 211-234. Go to original source...
  25. Mair, Peter. 2009. 'Representative versus Responsible Government.' MPIfG Working Paper 09/8. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  26. Mair, Peter. 2011. 'Smaghi vs the Parties: Representative Government and Institutional Constraints.' Paper presented at the conference on 'Democracy in Straightjackets: Politics in an Age of Permanent Austerity'. Munich, Germany, 23-26 March.
  27. May, John D. 1973. 'Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity.' Political Studies 21 (2): 135-151. Go to original source...
  28. McCloskey, Herbert, Paul J. Hoffmann and Rosemary O'Hara. 1960. 'Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers.' American Political Science Review 54 (2): 406-427. Go to original source...
  29. Michels, Robert. [1962] 2009. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. 6th edition. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  30. Narud, Hanne M. and Audun Skare. 1999. 'Are Party Activists the Party Extremists? The Structure of Opinion in Political Parties.' Scandinavian Political Studies 22 (1): 44-65. Go to original source...
  31. Norris, Pippa. 1995. 'May's Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties.' Party Politics 1 (1): 29-47. Go to original source...
  32. Ostrogorski, Moisei I. 1910. Democracy and the Party System in the United States: A Study in Extra-Constitutional Government. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  33. Rapoport, Ronald B., Allan I. Abramowitz and John McGlennon (eds.). 1986. The Life of Parties: Activists in Presidential Politics. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
  34. Rose, Richard. 1974. Politics in England. 2nd edition. London: Faber.
  35. Searing, Donald. D. 1986. 'A Theory of Political Socialization: Institutional Support and Deradicalization in Britain.' British Journal of Political Science 16 (3): 341-376. Go to original source...
  36. Seyd, Patrick and Paul Whiteley. 1992. Labours Grass Roots: The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  37. Seyd, Patrick and Paul Whiteley. 2002. 'New Labour's Grassroots: The Transformation of the Labour Party Membership.' Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  38. Soule, John W. and James W. Clarke. 1971. 'Issue Conflict and Consensus: A Comparative Study of Democratic and Republican Delegates to the 1968 National Conventions.' Journal of Politics 33 (1): 72-91. Go to original source...
  39. Trapl, Miloš. 2000. 'Katolické strany do roku 1938. ČSL v letech 1945-1948. Politické strany v exilu.' (Catholic Parties to 1938: Czechoslovak People's Party 1945-1948) Pp. 151-159, 305-308, 347-358 in Přehled politického stranictví na území českých zemí a Československa v letech 1861-1998, edited by P. Marek et al. Olomouc: Gloria.
  40. Trapl, Miloš. 2004a. 'Československá strana lidová.' (Czechoslovak People's Party) Pp. 655-681 in Politické strany I. 1861-1938, edited by J. Malíř and P. Marek. Brno: Doplněk.
  41. Trapl, Miloš. 2004b. 'Československá strana lidová.' (Czechoslovak People's Party) Pp. 1175-1187 in Politické strany II. 1938-2004, edited by J. Malíř and P. Marek. Brno: Doplněk.
  42. Whiteley, Paul and Patrick Seyd. 2002. High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press. Go to original source...
  43. Whiteley, Paul, Patrick Seyd and Jeremy Richardson. 1994. True Blues: The Politics of Conservative Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.